Independence of placement for local Fourier analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Local Fourier analysis (LFA) serves a prominent role in the prediction of the convergence factor of multigrid methods for discretizations of PDEs. However, few discussions about the implementation of LFA for complicated discretizations of PDEs exist, such as higher order finite elements, as staggered meshes could lead to complex LFA representations of the grid‐transfer operator. In this work, we prove that the LFA representation for d ‐dimensional PDEs is independent of the placement of degrees of freedom (DoFs). Intuitively speaking, the seeding of the unknowns has no direct effect on the LFA presentation, instead, it serves as a unitary transformation between different representations. Thus, different LFA representations for a given PDE have the same spectrum and norm. Furthermore, we provide a uniform representation in terms of the location of the unknowns, named simple representation, where we allocate all of the DoFs at nodes, resulting in a simple and unified way to compute the symbols of the discrete operators, especially for the grid‐transfer operators. This simple representation can contribute to the generalization of the implementation of LFA for different types of discretizations and different problems, especially for higher order discretization methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it