MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158387643 · doi:10.1063/5.0044164

Computational study of gaseous cellular detonation diffraction and re-initiation by small obstacle induced perturbations

2021· article· en· W3158387643 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and Detonation Processes
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Key Laboratory Foundation of China
KeywordsDetonationPhysicsMechanicsObstacleInstabilityShock waveMach reflectionOblique shockExplosive material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A gaseous detonation wave that emerges from a channel into an unconfined space is known as detonation diffraction. If the dimension of the channel exit is below some critical value, the incident detonation fails to re-initiate (i.e., transmit into a self-sustained detonation propagating) in the unconfined area. In a previous study, Xu et al. [“The role of cellular instability on the critical tube diameter problem for unstable gaseous detonations,” Proc. Combust. Inst. 37(3), 3545–3533 (2019)] experimentally demonstrated that, for an unstable detonable mixture (i.e., stoichiometric acetylene–oxygen), a small obstacle near the channel exit promotes the re-initiation capability for cases with a sub-critical channel size. In the current study, two-dimensional numerical simulations were performed to reveal this obstacle-triggered re-initiation process in greater detail. Parametric studies were carried out to examine the influence of obstacle position on the re-initiation capability. The results show that a collision between a triple-point wave complex at the diffracting shock front and the obstacle is required for a successful re-initiation. If an obstacle is placed too close or too far away from the channel exit, the diffracting detonation cannot be re-initiated. Since shot-to-shot variation in the cellular wave structure of the incident detonation results in different triple-point trajectories, for an obstacle at a fixed position, the occurrence of re-initiation is of a stochastic nature. The findings of this study highlight that flow instability generated by a local perturbation is effective in enhancing the re-initiation capability of a diffracting cellular detonation wave in an unstable mixture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.418
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it