A versatile, fast and unbiased method for estimation of gene-by-environment interaction effects on biobank-scale datasets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Current methods to evaluate gene-by-environment (GxE) interactions on biobank-scale datasets are limited. MonsterLM enables multiple linear regression on genome-wide datasets, does not rely on parameters specification and provides unbiased estimates of variance explained by GxE interaction effects. We applied MonsterLM to the UK Biobank for eight blood biomarkers (N=325,991), identifying significant genome-wide interaction variance with waist-to-hip ratio for five biomarkers, with variance explained by interactions ranging from 0.11 to 0.58. 48% to 94% of GxE interaction variance can be attributed to variants without significant marginal association with the phenotype of interest. Conversely, for most traits, >40% of interaction variance was explained by less than 5% of genetic variants. We observed significant improvements in polygenic score prediction with incorporation of GxE interactions in four biomarkers. Our results imply an important contribution of GxE interaction effects, driven largely by a restricted set of variants distinct from loci with strong marginal effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.022 | 0.051 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".