MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158509140 · doi:10.1101/2021.04.28.441785

Coherent activity at three major lateral hypothalamic neural outputs controls the onset of motivated behavior responses

2021· preprint· en· W3158509140 on OpenAlexafffund
Ekaterina Martianova, Alicia Pageau, Nikola Pausic, Tommy Doucet Gentiletti, Danahé Leblanc, Christophe D. Proulx

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicZebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsOptogeneticsVentral tegmental areaDorsal raphe nucleusNeuroscienceDopamineBiological neural networkLateral hypothalamusPeriaqueductal grayAxonMidbrainRaphe nucleiPsychologyHypothalamusSerotoninBiologySerotonergicCentral nervous systemDopaminergic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The lateral hypothalamus (LH) plays an important role in motivated behavior. However, it is not known how LH neural outputs dynamically signal to major downstream targets to organize behavior. We used multi-fiber photometry to show that three major LH neural outputs projecting to the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN), ventral tegmental area (VTA), and lateral habenula (LHb) exhibit significant coherent activity in mice engaging motivated responses, which decrease during immobility. Mice engaging active coping responses exhibit increased activity at LH axon terminals that precedes an increase in the activity of serotonin neurons and dopamine neurons, indicating that they may play a role in initiating active responses stemming from LH signal transmissions. The optogenetic activation of LH axon terminals in either the DRN, VTA, or LHb was sufficient to increase mobility but had different effects on passive avoidance and sucrose consumption, suggesting that LH outputs use complementary mechanisms to control behavioral responses. Our results support the notion that the three LH neural outputs play complementary roles in initiating motivated behaviors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicZebrafish Biomedical Research ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207