Uniform stresses inside both a non-parabolic inhomogeneity and a non-elliptical inhomogeneity located in the vicinity of a circular Eshelby inclusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We establish the uniformity of stresses inside both a non-parabolic open inhomogeneity and a non-elliptical closed inhomogeneity interacting with a nearby circular Eshelby inclusion undergoing uniform anti-plane eigenstrains when the surrounding matrix is subjected to uniform remote anti-plane stresses. Our procedure involves the introduction of a conformal mapping function for the doubly connected domain occupied by the matrix and the circular Eshelby inclusion. Two conditions are established in order to achieve the uniformity property inside each of the two inhomogeneities. Our results indicate that: (a) the internal uniform stresses are independent of the specific shapes of the two inhomogeneities and the existence of the nearby circular Eshelby inclusion; (b) the open and closed shapes of the respective inhomogeneities are significantly affected by the presence of the circular Eshelby inclusion. We also consider the two more complex cases involving: (a) an arbitrary number of circular Eshelby inclusions undergoing uniform eigenstrains; (b) a circular Eshelby inclusion undergoing linear eigenstrains. Detailed numerical results demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed theory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".