Clinical manifestations and treatment outcomes in degos disease: a systematic review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Degos disease (atrophic papulosis) is a rare vasculopathy with cutaneous and systemic manifestations. Although potentially fatal, the characteristics of and treatments for Degos disease variants are not adequately described. We conducted a systematic review to summarize cutaneous and systemic presentations, treatments and outcomes of malignant (MAP) and benign (BAP) variants of Degos disease. A comprehensive search was conducted on Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL and CENTRAL on 27 October 2020, which yielded 254 original studies reporting cases of Degos disease. A total of 357 patients were included in the analysis. Mean age of onset was 33.9 years. MAP was most commonly reported (63.8%, n = 228/357), with 56.6% (n = 129/228) mortality. Cutaneous lesions were usually asymptomatic (26.3%, n = 81/308) and localized to the trunk (57.7%, n = 206/357) and extremities (56.8%, n = 203/357). Systemic involvement developed within 2 years on average, ranging from 0 to 28 years. Anti-platelet monotherapy had a complete resolution rate of 42.3% (n = 11/26) in BAP and 20.0% (n = 7/35) in MAP. Based on the findings of the study, most cases of Degos disease are malignant with high mortality, and even benign cutaneous cases may develop systemic disease in as late as 28 years. Anti-platelet monotherapies may prove effective against both variants. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".