MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158592082 · doi:10.3390/rs13091795

Integrating Spectral and Textural Information for Monitoring the Growth of Pear Trees Using Optical Images from the UAV Platform

2021· article· en· W3158592082 on OpenAlexaff
Yahui Guo, Shouzhi Chen, Zhaofei Wu, Shuxin Wang, Christopher Bryant, J. Senthilnath, Mário Cunha, Yongshuo H. Fu

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUniversité de Montréal
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEnvironmental sciencePEARLinear regressionPrincipal component analysisHumidityCoefficient of determinationRemote sensingRegression analysisAir temperatureMultivariate statisticsSoil scienceAtmospheric sciencesMeteorologyMathematicsStatisticsGeographyComputer scienceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the recent developments of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing, it is possible to monitor the growth condition of trees with the high temporal and spatial resolutions of data. In this study, the daily high-throughput RGB images of pear trees were captured from a UAV platform. A new index was generated by integrating the spectral and textural information using the improved adaptive feature weighting method (IAFWM). The inter-relationships of the air climatic variables and the soil’s physical properties (temperature, humidity and conductivity) were firstly assessed using principal component analysis (PCA). The climatic variables were selected to independently build a linear regression model with the new index when the cumulative variance explained reached 99.53%. The coefficient of determination (R2) of humidity (R2 = 0.120, p = 0.205) using linear regression analysis was the dominating influencing factor for the growth of the pear trees, among the air climatic variables tested. The humidity (%) in 40 cm depth of soil (R2 = 0.642, p < 0.001) using a linear regression coefficient was the largest among climatic variables in the soil. The impact of climatic variables on the soil was commonly greater than those in the air, and the R2 grew larger with the increasing depth of soil. The effects of the fluctuation of the soil-climatic variables on the pear trees’ growth could be detected using the sliding window method (SWM), and the maximum absolute value of coefficients with the corresponding day of year (DOY) of air temperature, soil temperature, soil humidity, and soil conductivity were confirmed as 221, 227, 228, and 226 (DOY), respectively. Thus, the impact of the fluctuation of climatic variables on the growth of pear trees can last 14, 8, 7, and 9 days, respectively. Therefore, it is highly recommended that the adoption of the integrated new index to explore the long-time impact of climate on pears growth be undertaken.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote SensingSame topicRemote Sensing in AgricultureFrench-language works237,207