Integrating Spectral and Textural Information for Monitoring the Growth of Pear Trees Using Optical Images from the UAV Platform
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the recent developments of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing, it is possible to monitor the growth condition of trees with the high temporal and spatial resolutions of data. In this study, the daily high-throughput RGB images of pear trees were captured from a UAV platform. A new index was generated by integrating the spectral and textural information using the improved adaptive feature weighting method (IAFWM). The inter-relationships of the air climatic variables and the soil’s physical properties (temperature, humidity and conductivity) were firstly assessed using principal component analysis (PCA). The climatic variables were selected to independently build a linear regression model with the new index when the cumulative variance explained reached 99.53%. The coefficient of determination (R2) of humidity (R2 = 0.120, p = 0.205) using linear regression analysis was the dominating influencing factor for the growth of the pear trees, among the air climatic variables tested. The humidity (%) in 40 cm depth of soil (R2 = 0.642, p < 0.001) using a linear regression coefficient was the largest among climatic variables in the soil. The impact of climatic variables on the soil was commonly greater than those in the air, and the R2 grew larger with the increasing depth of soil. The effects of the fluctuation of the soil-climatic variables on the pear trees’ growth could be detected using the sliding window method (SWM), and the maximum absolute value of coefficients with the corresponding day of year (DOY) of air temperature, soil temperature, soil humidity, and soil conductivity were confirmed as 221, 227, 228, and 226 (DOY), respectively. Thus, the impact of the fluctuation of climatic variables on the growth of pear trees can last 14, 8, 7, and 9 days, respectively. Therefore, it is highly recommended that the adoption of the integrated new index to explore the long-time impact of climate on pears growth be undertaken.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".