MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158629994 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsab072.038

039 Sleep Preferentially Supports Problem-Solving Skills via Greater Functional Connectivity Between the Caudate and Cerebral Cortex

2021· article· en· W3158629994 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nicholas van den Berg, Dylan Smith, Lydia Fang, Stuart Fogel

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcedural memoryFunctional magnetic resonance imagingPutamenPsychologyWakefulnessSleep (system call)NeuroscienceCognitive psychologyCognitionMotor skillEffects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performancePhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicineComputer scienceElectroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Sleep consolidates memory, including newly acquired procedural skills. One putative systems-level mechanism for this function of sleep is via sleep-dependent strengthening of functional connectivity between the putamen and the cortico-hippocampal-striatal-cerebellar network, which supports procedural motor skills. For procedural motor skills that also require problem solving and rule-learning, sleep preferentially benefits the cognitively complex aspects over the motor skills required to execute the solution itself. The caudate is implicated in higher-order cognitive components of skill learning, which include error monitoring and automizing new information. In the current study, we investigated how sleep alters functional connectivity in higher-order learning networks that support problem solving and rule learning-related procedural skills. Methods Participants (n = 38) were trained on a procedural skills task; the Tower of Hanoi (ToH), that requires the acquisition of a novel cognitive strategy (e.g., recursive logic), while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). After either a full night of sleep (n=19) or a full day of wakefulness (n=19), participants were retested on the same task in the fMRI. Resting state activity was acquired before (R1) and after the training session (R2), and before the retest session (R3). Results Behavioral performance on the ToH improved following sleep compared to wake (reduced number of errors: t(38)=2.92, p=0.006, d=1.24). Regions associated with higher-order learning and cognitive complexity (i.e., the caudate) and regions typically implicated in sequence learning (i.e., the putamen, hippocampus, cerebellum) were selected as regions of interest (ROI). Increased functional connectivity across the retention interval (R3-R2) was observed in the sleep vs. wake condition between the caudate and the motor cortex (t(36)=3.32, p=0.042, FWE). By contrast, changes in functional connectivity were not observed between the putamen and other ROIs. Conclusion These results suggest that sleep supports improved consolidation of motor skills that involve the acquisition of a novel cognitive strategy. Sleep enhanced functional connectivity in brain areas associated with higher-order cognitive skills (i.e., the caudate), but not regions typically associated with motor skills (i.e., the putamen) that are required to execute the solution to the cognitive procedural skill. Support (if any) Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicSleep and Wakefulness ResearchFrench-language works237,207