MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158757734 · doi:10.1139/cjb-2021-0023

Alternate host screening of <i>Thekopsora areolata</i> in Scandinavia: a new record on <i>Prunus grayana</i>

2021· article· en· W3158757734 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ke Zhang, Åke Olson, Berit Samils, Juha Kaitera

Bibliographic record

VenueBotany · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKungl. Skogs- och LantbruksakademienOulun YliopistoVetenskapsrådetSvenska Forskningsrådet Formas
KeywordsPrunusBiologyHost (biology)BotanySubspeciesEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cherry spruce rust caused by Thekopsora areolata (Fr.) Magnus results in significant losses in spruce seed production in the forest industry. The pathogen is present in Asia and Europe but absent from North America where it has been considered as a potential threat and listed as a quarantine organism by the United States Department of Agriculture. A comprehensive list and in-depth information regarding the alternate hosts of this pathogen are important for conducting epidemiological studies and for optimal disease control. Prunus padus L. is the main alternate host reported for T. areolata. In this study, we investigated the susceptibility of domestic and exotic Prunus spp. and other potential alternate host-plant species native to Scandinavia to T. areolata infection through a field survey and aeciospore inoculation experiments in the greenhouse and laboratory. No new susceptible species were found. In Sweden, a new record of Prunus grayana Maxim. with low susceptibility to T. areolata was found. In addition, we updated the list of currently confirmed alternate hosts of T. areolata according to field observations and inoculation results. Prunus padus and Prunus serotina Ehrh., as well as their hybrids and subspecies of Prunus padus, are highly susceptible, while Prunus depressa Pursh, Prunus grayana, Prunus spinosa L., and Prunus tenella Batsch are considered slightly susceptible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.323
Threshold uncertainty score0.583

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBotanySame topicYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesFrench-language works237,207