MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158790519 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.104.034309

Spectroscopy of states in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Ba</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>136</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math> using the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Ba</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>138</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math> reaction

2021· article· lv· W3158790519 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2021
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsTRIUMFUniversity of Guelph
FundersClaude Leon FoundationNational Research FoundationU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of ScienceNational Science Foundation
KeywordsExcited stateExcitationSpectroscopySHELL modelMatrix (chemical analysis)IsotopeNuclear reactionMatrix element

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The $^{136}\mathrm{Ba}$ isotope is the daughter nucleus in $^{136}\mathrm{Xe}\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\beta}$ decay. It also lies in a shape transitional region of the nuclear chart, making it a suitable candidate to test a variety of nuclear models.Purpose: To obtain spectroscopic information on states in $^{136}\mathrm{Ba}$, which will allow a better understanding of its low-lying structure. These data may prove useful to constrain future $^{136}\mathrm{Xe}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}^{136}\mathrm{Ba}$ neutrinoless $\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\beta}$ decay matrix element calculations.Methods: A $^{138}\mathrm{Ba}(p,t)$ reaction was used to populate states in $^{136}\mathrm{Ba}$ up to approximately 4.6 MeV in excitation energy. The tritons were detected using a high-resolution Q3D magnetic spectrograph. A distorted wave Born approximation analysis was performed for the measured triton angular distributions.Results: 102 excited states in $^{136}\mathrm{Ba}$ were observed, out of which 52 are reported for the first time. Definite spin-parity assignments are made for 26 newly observed states, while previously ambiguous assignments for ten other states are resolved. Together with other available data, the results are used to determine level densities in $^{136}\mathrm{Ba}$. These were compared with theory predictions, obtained using shell model calculations with Hamiltonians previously used for $^{136}\mathrm{Xe}$ neutrinoless $\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\beta}$ decay matrix element evaluations.Conclusions: The shell model predicted level densities agree reasonably well for the two Hamiltonians. However the results for theory and experiment are found to agree only at lower energies, diverging from one another for the higher lying states, with the discrepancy increasing with energy. This is presumably because of lower production cross sections for a majority of the higher-lying predicted states and the experimental limitations in resolving a large number of nearly degenerate states predicted by the theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.290

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0870.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207