Efeito de dietas hiperproteicas nas adaptações musculares induzidas pelo treinamento resistido: revisão de literatura
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O objetivo do estudo foi analisar o efeito de dietas hiperproteicas nas adaptações musculares em indivíduos praticantes de treinamento resistido, assim como relatar possíveis alterações em dosagens bioquímicas de hormônios anabólicos. Foi realizada uma revisão da literatura nas bases de dados online PubMed, Scopus e Web of Science. Os estudos encontrados analisaram o efeito da ingestão de proteínas em quantidades a partir de 0,8 g/kg/dia até 4,4 g/kg/dia em períodos de duas a dezesseis semanas. Corroborando com a International Society of Sports Nutrition, Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Dietitians of Canada, American College of Sports Medicine e Nutrition guidelines for strentgh sports: Sprinting, weightlifting, throwing events, and bodybuilding, a presente revisão aponta que a ingestão de proteínas visando a hipertrofia muscular em praticantes de treinamento resistido, deve ser de aproximadamente 2 g/kg/dia. Quantidades acima deste valor não resultam em maior aumento de massa muscular em praticantes de treinamento resistido.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".