MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3158916358 · doi:10.1139/gen-2020-0175

Identification and characterization of heat-responsive microRNAs at the booting stage in two rice varieties, 9311 and Nagina 22

2021· article· en· W3158916358 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ying Luo, Tao Wang, Dan Yang, Biao Luo, Weiping Wang, Dong Yu, Fu-Lin He, Qiming Wang, Liqun Rao

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Molecular Biology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologymicroRNAGeneGeneticsDeep sequencingComputational biologyGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, non-coding, regulatory RNAs that play important roles in abiotic stress responses in plants, but their regulatory roles in the adaptive response to heat stress at the booting stage in two rice varieties, 9311 and Nagina 22, remain largely unknown. In this study, 464 known miRNAs and 123 potential novel miRNAs were identified. Of these miRNAs, a total of 90 differentially expressed miRNAs were obtained with 9311 libraries as the control group, of which 54 were upregulated and 36 were downregulated. To gain insight into functional significance, 2773 potential target genes of these 90 differentially expressed miRNAs were predicted. GO enrichment analysis showed that the predicted target genes of differentially expressed miRNAs included NACs, LACs, CSD, and Hsp40. KEGG pathway analysis showed that the target genes of these differentially expressed miRNAs were significantly enriched in the plant hormone signal transduction pathway. The expression levels of 10 differentially expressed miRNAs and their target genes obtained by qRT-PCR were largely consistent with the sequencing results. This study lays a foundation for the elucidation of the miRNA-mediated regulatory mechanisms in rice at elevated temperatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenome→Same topicPlant Molecular Biology Research→French-language works237,207→