MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3159091335 · doi:10.55275/jposna-2021-274

Levels of Evidence Are Not the Whole Story

2021· article· en· W3159091335 on OpenAlexaff
Susan E. Nelson, Unni Narayanan, Matthew R. Schmitz, Scott McKay

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Sciences Research and Education
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEvidence-based medicineCritical appraisalQuality (philosophy)Medical literatureQuality of evidencePsychologyMedicineAlternative medicineEpistemologyMeta-analysisPathologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Levels of evidence (LOE) are classification systems that use a hierarchal structure to indicate where the research in question may fall in regard to the strength of the recommendations. They have been used in some form in medical literature since the 1970s and have continued to be refined for ease of use by the practicing physician.  The purpose of this article is to define LOE as commonly used in the orthopaedic literature and to highlight that LOE alone is not always sufficient for assessing the quality of the evidence presented. Examples of research at different LOE are presented and discussed, highlighting the importance of critical appraisal when using these guidelines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.212
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North AmericaSame topicHealth Sciences Research and EducationFrench-language works237,207