MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3159104856 · doi:10.21423/aabppro20054876

Risk Factors Associated with Neospora caninum Herd Serological Status in Beef Cow-Calf Herds in Canada

2005· article· en· W3159104856 on OpenAlexaffabout
N. Olaloku, C. Power, Rosemary Hood, R. C. M. Jaime, John Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference Proceedings · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicToxoplasma gondii Research Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Food Inspection AgencyUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeospora caninumSeroprevalenceHerdBiologyVeterinary medicineSerologyNeosporaBeef cattleAbortionPregnancyHorizontal transmissionFecesTransmission (telecommunications)Animal scienceAntibodyMedicineImmunologyToxoplasma gondiiVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neospora caninum (N. caninum), a protozoan parasite, is a major cause of reproductive failure in cows all over North America and in other regions of the world. Infected cows are at risk of early embryonic death, abortion, stillbirth, birth of a weak or abnormal calf and birth of a calf with no obvious defect, depending on previous exposure and the phase of gestation-early, mid or late. The dog has been implicated as a definitive host of N. caninum and contributing to fecal-oral (horizontal) transmission. It has been suggested that neonates become infected while in-utero (vertical transmission). The role of wild canids, coyotes and foxes in transmitting infection in beef cow-calf is still not clear. Although suggested, it is not known if extensive husbandry and management methods employed in beef cow-calf plays a role in N. caninum infection, transmission and disease occurrence in beef cow-calf herds. The objective of this study was to determine seroprevalence of N. caninum in beef cow-calf herds in Canada and to identify potential risk factors contributing to seroprevalence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference ProceedingsSame topicToxoplasma gondii Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207