MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3159201046

Feasibility of administrating a cognitive screening tool by telephone prior to surgery in older adults-preliminary results

2021· article· en· W3159201046 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lawton S. Cooper, Shilpa Krishnan, Houman Javedan, A Bader, Samir Tulebaev

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMontreal Cognitive AssessmentDeliriumDementiaActivities of daily livingCognitionAnxietyCohortCognitive testCognitive declinePhysical therapyGerontologyCognitive impairmentInternal medicinePsychiatryDisease
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Preoperative cognitive assessment has been advocated for adults ≥ 65 years-old due to increased risk for post-operative complications such as postoperative delirium, postoperative cognitive decline, and increased mortality. Most screening tools for cognitive impairment require in-person evaluation. During the COVID-19 pandemic, most medical centers have changed their workflows to telemedicine platforms. In this study we aim to assess the feasibility of a telephone-based cognitive assessment tool, the Mini-Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Mini-MOCA) prior to surgery and 30-day post surgery to evaluate any changes in cognitive function. Methods: Patients age ≥70 year who were candidates for surgery and had a telemedicine visit in the preoperative clinic during December 2020 were included. Exclusion criteria included hearing impairment, day-surgery, inability to speak English and a prior diagnosis of Dementia. Eligible patients were asked to complete an attention test, the Mini-MOCA and function assessment using the Katz score for activities of daily living (ADL) and Lawton-Brody for instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). Anxiety was assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item (GAD-2). Baseline demographics including medications and education level were collected. Anti-cholinergic effect was assessed using an anti-cholinergic score calculator (ACS). Results: Overall 24 patients completed the preoperative assessment. The cohort was 50% female, white (96%), with a median age of 74 years (range: 71-82). The median number of medications was 8 (range:2-20), 16/24 (67%) taking medications with anti-cholinergic effects and a median ACS of 1 (range 1-13), and 4/24 (17%) on Benzodiazepines. The median Katz score was 6 (range: 4-6) and Lawton-Brody score 8 (range: 5-8). The mean time for completion of the phone assessment was 10 minutes and 4 minutes for the Mini- MOCA. The median Mini-MOCA score was 13.5 (range: 9-15). Conclusions: In our preliminary results we show that a telephone- based cognitive assessment prior to surgery is well accepted and feasible among older adults who are candidates for surgery. Our study is ongoing, and will continue to conduct pre- and post-operative cognitive evaluations (updated results will be presented).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Geriatrics Society→Same topicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders→French-language works237,207→