MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3159415178 · doi:10.1101/2021.04.24.21256011

Reduced Reflex Autonomic Responses following Intradetrusor OnabotulinumtoxinA Injections: A pre/post study in Individuals with Cervical and Upper Thoracic Spinal Cord Injury

2021· preprint· en· W3159415178 on OpenAlexafffund
Tristan W. Dorey, Matthias Walter, Andrei V. Krassioukov

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsGF Strong Rehabilitation CentreUniversity of British ColumbiaLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaInternational Collaboration On Repair DiscoveriesUniversity of Calgary
FundersAllerganVancouver Coastal Health Research InstituteRick Hansen FoundationMichael Smith Health Research BCRick Hansen Institute
KeywordsAutonomic dysreflexiaMedicineSpinal cord injuryHeart rate variabilityAutonomic nervous systemCohortHeart rateProspective cohort studyReflexSpinal cordCohort studyAnesthesiaBlood pressureCardiologyInternal medicinePhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Importance Urodynamic studies (UDS) can provoke autonomic dysreflexia (AD) in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) at and above the sixth thoracic (T6) spinal segment potentially leading to profound vagally mediated heart rate reductions. Intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections have been shown to reduce AD events during UDS in this cohort but evidence is lacking whether this treatment can improve reflex autonomic responses. Objective To assess the effects of intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections on heart rate variability (HRV) responses to UDS in individuals, 18-65 years of age, with chronic (>1-year) SCI at or above T6 with confirmed neurogenic detrusor overactivity and AD during UDS. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study used participants from our recent prospective phase IV clinical trial. Individuals were screened at an academic medical centre between November 2014 and December 2019. After enrollment, participants underwent UDS prior to (i.e., baseline) and one month after intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections (post-treatment). Interventions OnabotulinumtoxinA (200 U) was injected into the detrusor muscle at 20 sites (10 U/site). Main Outcomes and Measures Continuous electrocardiogram (ECG) and blood pressure (BP) recordings were used to assess RR-interval, time and frequency domain metrics of HRV (a surrogate marker of autonomic nervous system activity), and AD pre- and post-intervention. Results A total of 19 participants with SCI (5 women; mean [SD] age 42 [8.3] years) with complete ECG and BP data sets were suitable for autonomic analysis. During baseline UDS, an increase in RR-interval (adjusted mean difference, -0.08; 95% CI, -0.14 to -0.03; P =0.002) as well as time and frequency domain metrics of HRV were detected. Vagally mediated increases in high frequency (HF) power during UDS were larger in participants with cervical SCI compared to upper thoracic SCI (adjusted mean difference, 20.3; 95% CI, 3.3 to 37.2; P =0.013). Intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections significantly reduced time domain metrics of HRV and HF power (adjusted mean difference, 9.1; 95% CI, 3.1 to 15.1, P <0.01) responses to UDS across all participants. Conclusions and Relevance Changes in HRV during UDS could be a potential indicator of improved autonomic cardiovascular function following interventions such as intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02298660

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207