MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3159435392 · doi:10.18280/mmep.080213

Experimental and Theoretical Investigation on a Solar Chimney System for Ventilation of a Living Room

2021· article· en· W3159435392 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Billal Belfegas, Salah Larbi, Tahar Tayebi

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSolar Energy Systems and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolar chimneyChimney (locomotive)GlazingPassive solar building designVentilation (architecture)AirflowMechanicsWork (physics)Mass flow rateEnvironmental scienceStack effectMeteorologyMarine engineeringSolar energyThermalMaterials scienceEngineeringMechanical engineeringPhysicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present work relates to the analysis of an energy system based on the solar chimney for passive ventilation of a living space. It consists of an experimental and theoretical study of the energy performance according to some geometrical and environmental parameters. The designed prototype was installed and followed for several days. In parallel, a numerical code was developed in FORTRAN platform to simulate the phenomena in the solar chimney and compare the theoretical results with those experimental in the transient regime. The results obtained relate to the distributions of temperature on the glazing, within the airflow and on the internal wall of the chimney. The hourly rate of air change (ACH), the air-outlet velocity and its mass flow rate have also been determined. The comparison of the results obtained in this study with those of the literature has shown a good agreement. The obtained results have shown that the incidental solar radiation plays a fundamental role in the energy performance of such systems and there is an optimum value of the ratio between the width of the chimney and the wall opening for a high rate of air renewal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicSolar Energy Systems and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207