MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3159449928 · doi:10.1676/19-104

First description of the structure and geographic patterns in the songs of the Connecticut Warbler ( <i>Oporornis agilis</i> )

2020· article· en· W3159449928 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin C. Hannah, Erin M. Bayne, Natalie V. Sánchez

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Wilson Journal of Ornithology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWarblerSongbirdGeographic variationEcologyRange (aeronautics)GeographyTaigaNearctic ecozoneBorealBiologyHabitatTaxonomy (biology)PopulationDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Geographic variation in song characteristics within songbird species has the potential to reveal some of the complex interactions between ecology and behavior. The Connecticut Warbler (Oporornis agilis) is an uncommon and little studied Neotropical migratory wood warbler that breeds across the southern boreal forest in North America. The song of the Connecticut Warbler has remained poorly described and, prior to our study, no detailed spectrographic analysis exists. We document 20 distinct song variants in this species, based on differences in the structure and sequence of notes within repeated phrases, from across the breeding range. One song type, distributed across the entire breeding range, represented 36% of our samples. Preliminary evidence suggests a lack of geographic structure and no evidence of dialects or regiolects in the song types of this species. Our results highlight a unique distribution in song types within the Oporornis–Geothlypis complex, providing a baseline for future studies of geographic variation in this, and related, species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Wilson Journal of OrnithologySame topicAnimal Vocal Communication and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207