Magnificent Fight: The 1919 Winnipeg General StrikeDirect Action Gets the Goods: A Graphic History of the Strike in Canada1919: A Graphic History of the Winnipeg General Strike
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Book Review| May 01 2021 Magnificent Fight: The 1919 Winnipeg General StrikeDirect Action Gets the Goods: A Graphic History of the Strike in Canada1919: A Graphic History of the Winnipeg General Strike Magnificent Fight: The 1919 Winnipeg General Strike. Lewycky, Dennis. Winnipeg, MB: Fernwood, 2019. 222 pp., $22.00 (paper); $21.99 (ebook).Direct Action Gets the Goods: A Graphic History of the Strike in Canada. Graphic History Collective, with Balmes, Althea, Hill, Gord, Keresztesi, Orion and Lester, David. Toronto, ON: Between the Line Books, 2019. 64 pp., $14.95 (paper).1919: A Graphic History of the Winnipeg General Strike. Graphic History Collective with Lester, David. Toronto, ON: Between the Line Books, 2019. 128 pp., $19.19 (paper). Julie Guard Julie Guard University of Manitoba Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Labor (2021) 18 (2): 124–127. https://doi.org/10.1215/15476715-8849400 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Julie Guard; Magnificent Fight: The 1919 Winnipeg General StrikeDirect Action Gets the Goods: A Graphic History of the Strike in Canada1919: A Graphic History of the Winnipeg General Strike. Labor 1 May 2021; 18 (2): 124–127. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/15476715-8849400 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter Books & JournalsAll JournalsLabor Search Advanced Search Issue Section: Book Reviews You do not currently have access to this content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".