MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3159474799 · doi:10.82308/12283

The propagation and failure mechanism of gaseous detonations : experiments in porous-walled tubes

2003· article· en· W3159474799 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and Detonation Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPorosityMechanism (biology)Materials sciencePorous mediumFailure mechanismForensic engineeringComposite materialEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to elucidate the propagation mechanism of detonations, the failure mechanism of detonations propagating in tubes with porous walls is investigated experimentally. Two distinct failure mechanisms were identified depending on the type of detonating mixture. Experiments in mixtures characterized by piecewise laminar reaction zone structures with weak three-dimensional effects revealed that the attenuation and failure is caused by the global mass divergence to the porous, permeable walls. The limits observed in these mixtures agreed very well with the theoretical limiting conditions for the existence of curved ZND detonations subjected to lateral expansions. Experiments were also conducted in a second class of mixtures, characterized by irregular cellular structures and turbulent reactions zones. When detonations in this class of mixtures are attenuated, transverse waves re-amplify from local instabilities in the reaction zone. This re-amplification permits the detonation wave to continue to propagate and overcome the effects of global mass divergence and transverse wave attenuation at the porous walls. Ultimately, when the rate of transverse wave re-generation is surpassed by the rate of transverse wave damping at the walls, the detonation can no longer be self-sustained and fails. The limits obtained in these irregular structure mixtures were found significantly wider than predicted by the ZND formulation, thus further confirming the important role of the three-dimensional turbulent structure in these detonations in providing a more efficient mechanism of gas ignition and propagation than detonations that exhibit a regular structure. The implications of the present study are that the ZND model is not valid in describing the reaction zone structure, the ignition mechanism and thus the propagation mechanism in these turbulent detonations. In these mixtures, the ignition mechanism is a combination of the classical mechanism of adiabatic shock compression leading to ignition as well as the intense turbulent mechanism usually attributed to deflagrations only.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score0.708

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it