Coinfecção de anaplasmose e erliquiose: Relato de caso
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis’ co-infection is awfully common to the clinical routine of small animals. They’re mainly transmitted by the Rhipicephalus sanguineous tick and induce severe clinical symptoms, which are deadly able to lead specific animals to their death. A dog of the Labrador Breed was cared with 1.6-years-old male, weighing 30 kg and residing in Codó City, State of Maranhão, Brazil. In the anamnesis, it was reported that the dog was apathetic and without eat for few days, showing signs of weight loss and reddish spots. On clinical examination, the animal presented hyperthermia, pale and ocular mucous membranes, lethargic ineptitude, 8% of dehydration and capillary filling time greater than 5 seconds. Nevertheless, the animal doesn’t showed changes in the heart rate, breathing movements and lymph nodes. For diagnosis, a rapid test was performed for Anaplasma and Ehrlichia in which were positive. Complete blood count, hepatic and renal serum biochemistry and urinalysis were also applied. The laboratory exams’ results were suggestive for the diagnosis of co-infection by Anaplasma spp. and Ehrlichia spp, confirming the rapid test results. After diagnosis, supportive treatment with fluid therapy, B complex, dexamethasone, doxicillin and iminocard was started. The treatment was efficient. Therefore, the animal was clinically healthy after 25 days of treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it