Eastern Wood-Pewee ( <i>Contopus virens</i> ) reproductive success in red pine plantations and deciduous forests in Ontario, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pine plantations comprise about 7% of total world forest cover and are increasing across the globe. We compared settlement times, breeding densities, and the effects of time, habitat, and nest-site characteristics on the nest success of Eastern Wood-Pewees (Contopus virens) in red pine (Pinus resinosa) plantations and deciduous forest stands in south-central Ontario, Canada, in 2007 and 2008. Our goal was to evaluate the quality of these 2 habitats for this declining aerial insectivore. Pine plantations and deciduous forest stands were settled nearly simultaneously and at similar breeding densities, suggesting no preference for either habitat. Nest success in pine plantations (22%) was lower than in deciduous forests (35%), corresponding to higher counts of red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) and Blue Jays (Cyanocitta cristata) in plantations. Daily nest survival was lowest when nestlings were about 5 d old, but improved substantially as nestlings aged, and over the nesting season. In both habitats, increased nest visibility was correlated with decreased nest survival. In pine plantations, nest survival was higher where trees were more dispersed, while in deciduous forests, nests situated farther from tree trunks had higher survival rates. In both habitats, Eastern Wood-Pewees may use outward branches, when available, to detect movement and then evade potential nest predators. Although pine plantations provide breeding habitat for Eastern Wood-Pewees, management that increases hardwood understories and overstories may help to reduce visibility of Eastern Wood-Pewee nests and to reduce the populations of generalist songbird predators.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".