Problem Solving, Emotional Regulation, Alexithymia in Relation to Parental Bonding: Study of Emerging Adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parental bonding is an important predictor that gives a lot of insight into parent-child relationship. It is the intense attachment that develops between parents and their baby. They know that the strong ties between parents and their child provide the baby's first model for intimate relationships and foster a sense of security and positive self-esteem. Several psychological factors associated to parental bonding are problem solving, alexithymia, and emotional regulation when emotional and cognitive development is considered. This research investigates the relationship between problem solving, alexithymia, and emotional regulation in the emerging adults with respect to parental bonding. The sample consisted of 60college going students (both male & female) from Jaipur city. The tool used were-Parental Bonding Instrument (Parker et al., 2003); Toronto Alexithymia Scale (Bagby et al., 1994); Emotional Regulation Questionnaire (Gross et al., 2003); Social Problem Solving Inventory-Revised (D'zurilla et al., 2002). A correlation analysis was done which revealed significant relationship among the variables contributing towards making parental bond an important psychological construct affecting emotional and cognitive development of a child.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".