Body-Mind Centering: An Exploration in Achieving Somatic Awareness for the Classical Ballet Dancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With each step and each breath a ballet dancer takes the body acts as a compass, guiding each internal discovery. The ability to maintain one’s bearings can be achieved through the process and balance of Body-Mind Centering. This technique, founded by theorist Bonnie Bainbridge Cohen, journeys into the ever-changing territory of the human body by exploring thoughts, feelings, energy, and movement. Specifically, somatic awareness is reached through the exploration of bones, muscles, and organs. The method of research was generated in the following ways: Extensive research conducted in the field of anatomy and kinesiology, and an anatomy document created for future dancers to utilize prior to in-studio work. Next, a combination of Cohen’s previously devised exercises and newly crafted exercises were put into practice in a studio setting. Both solo and group work was conducted, targeting specific groups of bones, muscles, or organs. Lastly, a journal was kept with all practical observations discovered, and a final document was generated to reveal and collaboratively synthesize the observations made. Numerous discoveries were made regarding the differences in the quality of movement alterations (internal vs. external), the movement of a trained ballet-body (urges and inclinations), as well as the methods of exercise exploration (improvisation vs. structure), and how each affected the types of movement generated by the dancer. Through both the discoveries and difficulties that arose during the research process, future options for study were generated, such as, in-studio workshops that explore the interaction and dialogue between multiple bodies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".