Uji Quality Control Erasure Pesawat Coumputed Radiography di Laboratorium Kampus ATRO Bali
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Uji Quality Control Erasure Pesawat Computed Radiography Di Laboratorium Kampus Atro Bali, bertujuan untuk mengetahui hasil Uji Quality Control Erasure Pesawat CR di Laboratorium ATRO Bali dan untuk mengetahui hasil uji Quality Control Erasure Pesawat CR di Laboratoium ATRO Bali sesuai standar expose index menurut service ontario atau tidak. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan yaitu kualitatif dan kuantitatif dengan pengujian Uji Quality Control Erasure Pesawat Computed Radiography dilaboratorium kampus ATRO Bali pada waktu Mei 2018. Populasi dari penelitian ini seluruh image plate (IP) radiografi yang digunakan di laboratorium kampus atro bali dengan sampel dalam penelitian ini menggunakan dua buah image plate (IP) ukuran 35x43cm serta subjek dalam penelitian ini yaitu petugas laboratorium di kampus ATRO bali dengan memberikan kuesioner agar mendapatkan informasi dengan melihat langsung fakta di lapangan. Data penelitian ini diambil dengan melakukan survey dan dokumentasi. Hasil pengujian dapat diperoleh nilai exposure index (EI) pada image plate 1 yaitu 3 dan image plate 2 yaitu 4. Kemudian hasil uji visual didapatkan nilai 100% artinya tidak ada bayangan dari exposure sebelumnya., kemudian hasil uji erasure dibandingkan dengan service ontario, 2011 didapatkan hasil kuanlitatif dilihat secara visual didapatkan tidak ada bayangan / artefak, kemuadian hasil uji menggunakan exposure index didapatkan hasil image plate 1 yaitu 3 dan image plate 2 yaitu 4 yang berarti tidak melebihi standar dimana standar exposure index yaitu 0-80 sehingga kaset yang diuji masih layak digunakan untuk pemeriksaan radiologi .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".