Bibliographic record
Abstract
Political-economic relations between Mexico and Canada. As part of our ongoing research on the image of the other in the national press of Mexico and Canada, in this paper we look at the configuration of political and economic ideologies as reflected in the press on the occasion of Mexican President-elect Vicente Fox’s official visit to Ottawa in August, 2000. To understand how the different ideologies present interact, we apply Antonio Gramsci’s concept of “ideological complex”, as developed in discursive terms by Hodge and Kress, as well as the Bakhtinian notion of “enunciative scene”, developed as an analytical concept by Fonte. Through specific textual readings, we trace a profile of the different positions taken by Mexican and Canadian newspapers in the three languages in question. We study the points of conflict and convergence between the various speakers involved (above all Fox and Chretien), and how certain key concepts like “poverty” are understood in very different ways in each country. Through analysis of press discourse we illustrate how a nationalist ideology confronts one of globalization, and we demonstrate the pertinence of detailed analysis of ideological expression pervading every level of language.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".