Symptom patterns of sexually abused teenage girls seeking services.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Child sexual abuse (CSA) is associated with a host of negative repercussions. Yet, scholarly reports highlight the diversity of symptom presentation in survivors of CSA. Relying on the complex posttraumatic stress disorder (C-PTSD) framework, this study aimed to identify symptom profiles in teenage girls seeking services following disclosure of CSA. Participants included 207 teenage girls aged 12-18. They completed questionnaires on PTSD symptoms (i.e., reexperiencing, avoidance, and hyperarousal) and domains of impairments of the C-PTSD (i.e., interpersonal difficulties, biology, affect and behavioral regulation, dissociation, cognition, and self-concept). A latent profile analysis identified three profiles: PTSD, Complex PTSD, and Resilient. Results support the validity of the C-PTSD model with a subgroup reporting classic PTSD symptoms as well as alterations in several domains of functioning. Our second aim was to explore potential correlates of the resulting symptom profiles. Both personal and family factors were found to distinguish profiles, with teens in the Resilient group reporting fewer associations with delinquent peers, less use of avoidance coping strategies, and more maternal support than the two other profiles. Furthermore, CSA severity did not differ between the Complex PTSD and the Resilient profiles. The current findings argue in favor of a more individualized approach to treatment taking into consideration differences in presentation of symptoms among profile teenage survivors of CSA. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".