MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3159912833 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvab048.1666

Studying the Genomic Role of Cathepsin-D in ER+ Breast Cancer

2021· article· en· W3159912833 on OpenAlexaff
Elham Dianati, Emmanuelle Liaudet‐Coopman, Sylvie Mader

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancer researchCathepsin DBreast cancerGene silencingTranscription factorBiologyEstrogen receptorEstrogen receptor alphaCell growthCarcinogenesisMolecular biologyCancerGeneGeneticsBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), a transcription factor implicated in induction of cell growth in breast cancer, is a therapeutic target that is expressed in >70% of breast tumors. The transcriptional activity of ERα is controlled by ligands and increased through its interaction with co-activators such as the p160/SRC and p300/CBP families. In an attempt to identify the ligand-specific protein complexes involved in transcriptional regulation by ERα, BioID and TurboID screens were performed in two ER+ breast cancer cell lines, T-47D and ZR-75-1. Surprisingly, Cathepsin-D (Cath-D), a lysosomal aspartyl endoproteinase that is an ER target gene, was identified in these screens. Cath-D expression is associated with a poor prognosis and increased metastasis rate in breast cancer irrespective of its catalytic activities {Glondu, 2001 #119}[i]. Cath-D is localized in part to the nucleus where it interacts with TRPS1, a repressor of GATA-mediated transcription and modulator of ERα signaling {Bach, 2015 #117}[ii]. Co-silencing Cath-D and TRPS1 suppressed cell proliferation and inhibited growth under soft agar, suggesting that they cooperate to drive tumorigenesis {Bach, 2015 #117}[ii]. We hypothesized that Cath-D plays genomic as well as non-genomic roles in breast tumor aggressiveness and may alter ERα-mediated transcription. The nuclear localization of Cath-D was confirmed by immunofluorescence using different commercialized antibodies and observed in western blots of chromatin-bound fractions in three different ERα+ breast cancer cell lines, T-47D, ZR-75 and MCF-7. Specificity of the antibodies was confirmed using siRNA-mediated suppression of Cath-D. Moreover, Cath-D was also identified in proximity to TurboID-ERα by LC-MS after chromatin fractionation. The proximity of ERα and Cath-D both in the cytoplasm and nucleus was confirmed by proximity Ligation Assay (PLA) in three ER+ cell lines. Co-immunoprecipitation assays indicated physical interaction of Cath-D with ERα in T-47D cell extracts. Further, Cath-D was detected by ChIP-qPCR on estrogen response elements (EREs) of two ERα target genes, TFF1 and GREB1 in T-47D and ZR-75 cells. These results suggest that Cath-D can interact with ERα on DNA and play genomic roles in ER+ breast cancer cells. [i] Glondu, M., et al. (2001). “A mutated cathepsin-D devoid of its catalytic activity stimulates the growth of cancer cells.” Oncogene20(47): 6920-6929. [ii] Bach, A. S., et al. (2015). “Nuclear cathepsin D enhances TRPS1 transcriptional repressor function to regulate cell cycle progression and transformation in human breast cancer cells.” Oncotarget6(29): 28084-28103.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicProtease and Inhibitor MechanismsFrench-language works237,207