MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3160018179

To Evaluate the Effectiveness of Isotonic Quadriceps Resistance Training onSelective Functional Activities and Pain in Patient with Osteoarthrosis of Knee

2021· article· en· W3160018179 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sankar K Sundaraganesh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of medical research/˜The œjournal of medical research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsometric exerciseWOMACMedicinePhysical therapyIsotonicOsteoarthritisPhysical medicine and rehabilitationResistance training
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of isotonic quadriceps resistance training on selective functional activities and pain in patient with osteoarthrosis of knee. Methods: Thirty patients with unilateral osteoarthrosis of knee, were randomly assigned in two groups. (Control N=15, Experimental N=15). The patient in the both groups were underwent wax therapy for 20 minutes by using clothing method in a day. The control group underwent isometric quadriceps muscle setting exercise for a period of 10 minutes, with a brief rest in between. The experimental group underwent of pain tolerable isotonic quadriceps muscle resisted exercise by using quadriceps chair for a period of 10 minutes, with a brief rest in between. Outcome measures: Functional capacity and pain during rest were tested before and after training in both the groups by using, NPRS (Numerical Pain Rating Scale) and WOMAC SCALE (Western Ontario and McMaster university osteoarthritis index). Results: The isometric training group scored a NPRS pain rating scale mean value of 1.87 ± 0.64 and isotonic resisted training shows a mean value of 2.67 ± 0.99 with a t value of 4.598 and a significant of p value 0.001. Also, the study revealed that the patient who received isometric training shows a WOMAC score mean difference of 9.28 ± 7.07 and isotonic resisted training shows a value of mean difference of 18.90 ± 8.07 with a t value of 3.474 and a significant of p value of 0.002. This shows that the isotonic resistance training and wax bath was highly effective in improving functional activity and reducing pain in patient with OA knee. Conclusion: Both the training group showed a marked decrease in pain scores and increase in functional activities. When compared between the groups, the isotonic training group had a significant improvement in functional activities and pain reduction in patient with OA knee.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of medical research/˜The œjournal of medical researchSame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207