MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 17390: Maternal and Fetal Cardiovascular Adaptations to Pregnancy and Outcomes in Mothers With Cardiac Disease - A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

2020· article· en· W3160049866 on OpenAlexaff
Brahmdeep S. Saini, Robin Ducas, Kenichiro Yamamura, Mike Seed, Rachel M. Wald

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyFetusPopulationObstetricsMagnetic resonance imagingCardiologyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Insufficient maternal cardiac output (CO) has been implicated in poor pregnancy outcomes in mothers with heart disease (HD). Simultaneous delineation of vascular flows in the mother and her fetus have not been reported but could contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms of adverse events in this susceptible population. Methods: Pregnant women with moderate or severe HD (n=22; age 32±5 years) were studied using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and were compared with healthy controls (n=21; 34±3 years). Each MRI study included maternal and fetal components during the third trimester of pregnancy (corresponding to peak CO) and six months postpartum (surrogate for baseline hemodynamics). Phase contrast (PC) imaging was used to quantify maternal and fetal vascular flows. Fetal vessel T1 and T2 oximetry was used for derivation of fetal oxygen delivery and consumption. Maternal cardiac index (CI) was calculated using CO and pre-pregnancy body surface area. In the HD group, an “adapter” to pregnancy was defined as a woman with peak pregnancy CI measurement which met or exceeded the mean CI in the control population. Maternal and fetal outcomes were recorded. Results: There was no antepartum differences in absolute CO or CI in HD versus controls (CO 7.2±1.5 versus 7.3±1.6 L/min, p=0.79; CI 4.0±0.7 versus 4.3±0.7 L/min/m 2 , p=0.28). The percent increase in CO and CI (antepartum minus postpartum) was greater in women with HD versus controls (CO 46±24% versus 27±16%, p=0.02; CI 51±28% versus 28±17%, p<0.01). Fetal growth and oxygen delivery/consumption were similar between groups. Six adverse maternal cardiovascular events occurred in the HD group (heart failure n=2 and arrhythmia n=4) and there were none in the control group. There were no adverse fetal events in either group. There were 6 HD adapters (30%) and the adverse event rate was lower as compared with non-adapters (0% versus 38%, p=0.03). Conclusions: Maternal and fetal vascular flows can be characterized in pregnancy using MRI. Impaired adaptation to pregnancy in women with HD, as determined by magnitude of change in CO/CI, appears to be associated with adverse outcomes of pregnancy in the mother.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiovascular Issues in PregnancyFrench-language works237,207