A Fine-Grained Visual Attention Approach for Fingerspelling Recognition in the Wild
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fingerspelling in sign language has been the means of communicating technical terms and proper nouns when they do not have dedicated sign language gestures. Automatic recognition of fingerspelling can help resolve communication barriers when interacting with deaf people. The main challenges prevalent in fingerspelling recognition are the ambiguity in the gestures and strong articulation of the hands. The automatic recognition model should address high inter-class visual similarity and high intra-class variation in the gestures. Most of the existing research in fingerspelling recognition has focused on the dataset collected in a controlled environment. The recent collection of a large-scale annotated fingerspelling dataset in the wild, from social media and online platforms, captures the challenges in a real-world scenario. In this work, we propose a fine-grained visual attention mechanism using the Transformer model for the sequence-to-sequence prediction task in the wild dataset. The fine-grained attention is achieved by utilizing the change in motion of the video frames (optical flow) in sequential context-based attention along with a Transformer encoder model. The unsegmented continuous video dataset is jointly trained by balancing the Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) loss and the maximum-entropy loss. The proposed approach can capture better fine-grained attention in a single iteration. Experiment evaluations show that it outperforms the state-of-the-art approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".