MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3160177048

Acquired resistance to reoviral oncolysis

2005· article· en· W3160177048 on OpenAlexaff
Manbok Kim, Catherine Egan, Patrick W.K. Lee, Peter Forsyth, Randal N. Johnston

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOncolytic virusFibrosarcomaHT1080VirologyBiologyVirusCell cultureViral replicationGenetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3381 The naturally occurring human reovirus has shown considerable potential as an oncolytic agent for Ras-dependent tumor cells in vitro and in animal model systems and is currently in human clinical trials. However, the potential for virus-susceptible tumor cell lines that contain activating mutations of Ras to develop resistance to reovirus has not been fully explored. To address this, we exposed the human fibrosarcoma HT1080 cell line, which contains an activated N-Ras gene and is highly sensitive to viral oncolysis, to several rounds of exposure to reovirus. Most but not all cells were killed on first exposure, and after three rounds of selection we derived populations that were highly resistant to viral oncolysis. The resistant cells were persistently infected by reovirus, producing functional reovirus continuously. The resistant cells retained the activating N-Ras mutation and high levels of Ras activity, suggesting that reduced Ras activity is not required for viral resistance. Reovirus generated from the resistant cells contains several mutations and shows reduced but still significant apoptotic potential in HT1080 cells compared to wild type reovirus. In addition, virus-resistant cells showed reduced cellular cathepsin B activity, which is associated with the viral infection cycle. The persistently infected cells can be cured of virus by growth in the presence of reovirus antibody for 3 weeks, generating virus-free ‘cured’ cells. The persistently infected cells and cured cells were then tested for tumor formation in SCID mice. In sharp contrast to the highly tumorigenic parental and cured cells, the persistently infected cells were not tumorigenic in vivo. Furthermore, the persistently infected cells were able to suppress the cured cells’ tumorigenic activity when co-injected, suggesting that reoviral persistence plays an important role in tumor suppression. To determine whether the reovirus-resistant cells can still be killed by chemotherapeutic agents or other oncolytic viruses, we challenged them with apoptotic inducers and E1B-negative adenovirus, resulting in significant apoptosis following both approaches. These findings suggest that both reovirus and host tumor cells can co-adapt during the acquisition of viral resistance. Even so, the virus-resistant tumor cells can still be killed by other anti-tumor strategies, and have not lost the capacity for apoptosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.369 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicVirus-based gene therapy research→French-language works237,207→