MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3160252895 · doi:10.1002/jctb.6801

Selective oligomerization of isobutylene in mixed <scp>C<sub>4</sub></scp> catalyzed by supported <scp>Fe(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>/β</scp> catalyst

2021· article· en· W3160252895 on OpenAlexaff
Shuai Liu, Fangyu Yu, Hui Tian, Qi Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCatalytic Processes in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsCarbon Engineering (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsobutyleneCatalysisOlefin fiberSpace velocityThermogravimetric analysisChemistryNuclear chemistrySelectivityMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND Methyl tert‐butyl ether (referred to as MTBE) is harmful to the environment and hence its use is limited in China. To avoid the waste of isobutylene as MTBE raw material and improve the utilization rate of isobutylene in mixed C4 fraction, supported Fe(NO3)3/β molecular sieve catalysts with different active components were prepared by the equal volume impregnation method. The catalysts were analyzed by X‐ray diffraction (XRD), Thermogravimetric analysis (TG), Temperature programmed desorption of NH3, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller analysis and scanning electron microscopy, and the catalytic performance of catalysts with mixed C4 fractions as raw materials and different active component loadings for selective oligomerization of isobutylene was investigated in a fixed bed reactor. RESULTS The results show that the catalyst has the best catalytic performance when the active component loading was 6%, the reaction temperature was 60 °C, the reaction pressure was 1 MPa and the reaction space velocity was 1.5 h−1. CONCLUSION The conversion rate of isobutylene was >90%, the selectivity of C8 olefin was ≈80% and there was almost no loss of n‐butene. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry (SCI).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical Technology & BiotechnologySame topicCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207