MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3160252895 · doi:10.1002/jctb.6801

Selective oligomerization of isobutylene in mixed <scp>C<sub>4</sub></scp> catalyzed by supported <scp>Fe(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>/β</scp> catalyst

2021· article· en· W3160252895 on OpenAlexaff
Shuai Liu, Fangyu Yu, Hui Tian, Qi Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCatalytic Processes in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsCarbon Engineering (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsobutyleneCatalysisOlefin fiberSpace velocityThermogravimetric analysisChemistryNuclear chemistrySelectivityMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND Methyl tert‐butyl ether (referred to as MTBE) is harmful to the environment and hence its use is limited in China. To avoid the waste of isobutylene as MTBE raw material and improve the utilization rate of isobutylene in mixed C 4 fraction, supported Fe(NO 3 ) 3 /β molecular sieve catalysts with different active components were prepared by the equal volume impregnation method. The catalysts were analyzed by X‐ray diffraction (XRD), Thermogravimetric analysis (TG), Temperature programmed desorption of NH 3 , Brunauer–Emmett–Teller analysis and scanning electron microscopy, and the catalytic performance of catalysts with mixed C 4 fractions as raw materials and different active component loadings for selective oligomerization of isobutylene was investigated in a fixed bed reactor. RESULTS The results show that the catalyst has the best catalytic performance when the active component loading was 6%, the reaction temperature was 60 °C, the reaction pressure was 1 MPa and the reaction space velocity was 1.5 h −1 . CONCLUSION The conversion rate of isobutylene was &gt;90%, the selectivity of C 8 olefin was ≈80% and there was almost no loss of n ‐butene. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry (SCI).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical Technology & BiotechnologySame topicCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207