MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3160315930 · doi:10.1049/cds2.12076

Characterizing a standard cell library for large scale design of memristive based signal processing

2021· article· en· W3160315930 on OpenAlexaff
Abubaker Sasi, Arash Ahmadi, Majid Ahmadi

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Circuits Devices & Systems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMemristorComputer scienceAdderCMOSElectronic engineeringComputer architectureSubtractorResistive random-access memoryStandard cellComputer engineeringComputer hardwareIntegrated circuitElectrical engineeringEngineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In recent years, the use of memristors in circuits design has rapidly increased and attracted research interest. Advances have been made to both the size and the complexity of memristor designs. Therefore, computer aided design tools are required to handle memristor‐based large‐scale designs. A comprehensive automatic framework for the design and synthesis of large‐scale memristor‐complementary metal‐oxide‐semiconductor (CMOS) circuits is described herein. This framework provides a synthesis approach that can be applied to all memristor‐based digital logic designs. In particular, it is a proposal for a characterization methodology of memristor‐based logic cells to generate a standard cell library file for large‐scale simulation. The proposed architecture is based on RRAM and ReRAM redox‐based devices and the memristor ratioed logic design approach. The proposed framework is implemented in the Cadence Virtuoso schematic‐level environment and was verified with Verilog‐XL, MATLAB, and the electronic design automation synopses compiler after being translated to the behavioral level. The proposed method can be applied to implement any digital logic design. Nevertheless, it is perfectly suitable for signal processing applications that require MATLAB functions to produce text files with hex values in order to overcome the limitations of the simulation environment. A framework is deployed herein for design of the memristor‐based parallel 8‐bit adder/subtractor and a 2D memristive‐based median filter. Both proposed designs memristor‐based adder/subtractor and memristive median filter have significant power reductions of 66% and 16% respectively, when compared to the same designs using CMOS technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Bench or experimentalhigh
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Bench or experimentalhigh
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Circuits Devices & SystemsSame topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207