MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3160365192 · doi:10.1109/led.2021.3079244

Trap Recovery by in-Situ Annealing in Fully-Depleted MOSFET With Active Silicide Resistor

2021· article· en· W3160365192 on OpenAlexaff
Sedki Amor, Valeriya Kilchytska, Denis Flandre, Philippe Galy

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Electron Device Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor materials and devices
Canadian institutionsInstitut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologiqueUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceAnnealing (glass)MOSFETTransconductanceOptoelectronicsSilicideTransistorCMOSResistorSilicon on insulatorElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringSiliconEngineeringMetallurgyVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work reports first original results on the impact of active in-situ electro-thermal recovery, on the electrical and low-frequency noise characteristics of N-type MOS transistor with thick high-k metal gate oxide, from 28 nm Fully Depleted Silicon-On-Insulator (FDSOI) process. In order to recover “typical” device characteristics, four cycles of local thermal annealing up to 590K are applied for 14 ms each, using an active silicide source. Experimental results reveal an important improvement of the “corner” transistor’s I-V behavior allowing the recovery of “typical” device characteristics. An increase of the maximum transconductance by 43% is obtained. In the same time, a typical device stays unaffected by this local annealing. Low-frequency noisemeasurements showa clear reduction of the 1/f noise and Random Telegraph Noise by almost one decade, after the electro-thermal recovery. This can explain the improvement of the electrical characteristics by annealing of defects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Electron Device LettersSame topicSemiconductor materials and devicesFrench-language works237,207