MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3160424237 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1454

Confirmation of ξ1 CMa’s ultra-slow rotation: magnetic polarity reversal and a dramatic change in magnetospheric UV emission lines

2021· article· en· W3160424237 on OpenAlexafffund
C. Erba, M. E. Shultz, V. Pétit, A. W. Fullerton, H. F. Henrichs, O. Kochukhov, Th. Rivinius, G. A. Wade

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSpace Telescope Science InstituteUniversity of DelawareUniversity of Delaware Research FoundationNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPhysicsRotation periodMagnetosphereAstrophysicsMagnetic dipoleRotation (mathematics)Magnetic fieldDipoleStarspotStar (game theory)AstronomyStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The magnetic β Cep pulsator ξ1 CMa has the longest rotational period of any known magnetic B-type star. It is also the only magnetic B-type star with magnetospheric emission that is known to be modulated by both rotation and pulsation. We report here the first unambiguous detection of a negative longitudinal magnetic field in ξ1 CMa (〈Bz〉 = −87 ± 2 G in 2019 and 〈Bz〉 = −207 ± 3 G in 2020), as well as the results of ongoing monitoring of the star’s H α variability. We examine evidence for deviation from a purely dipolar topology. We also report a new HST UV spectrum of ξ1 CMa obtained near magnetic null that is consistent with an equatorial view of the magnetosphere, as evidenced by its similarity to the UV spectrum of β Cep obtained near maximum emission. The new UV spectrum of ξ1 CMa provides additional evidence for the extremely long rotation period of this star via comparison to archival data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→