MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3160457845 · doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2021.119059

The role of GSK3 in metabolic pathway perturbations in cancer

2021· review· en· W3160457845 on OpenAlexafffund
David Papadopoli, Michaël Pollak, Ivan Topisirović

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPolyamine Metabolism and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchTerry Fox Research Institute
KeywordsPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayAMPKAutophagyWnt signaling pathwayGSK-3Metabolic pathwayProtein kinase BBiologyCancerSignal transductionCancer cellGlycogen synthaseCell biologyGlycogenCancer researchKinaseMetabolismProtein kinase APhosphorylationBiochemistryApoptosisGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Malignant transformation and tumor progression are accompanied by significant perturbations in metabolic programs. As such, cancer cells support high ATP turnover to construct the building blocks needed to fuel neoplastic growth. The coordination of metabolic networks in malignant cells is dependent on the collaboration with cellular signaling pathways. Glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) lies at the convergence of several signaling axes, including the PI3K/AKT/mTOR, AMPK, and Wnt pathways, which influence cancer initiation, progression and therapeutic responses. Accordingly, GSK3 modulates metabolic processes, including protein and lipid synthesis, glucose and mitochondrial metabolism, as well as autophagy. In this review, we highlight current knowledge of the role of GSK3 in metabolic perturbations in cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell ResearchSame topicPolyamine Metabolism and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207