Widespread Persistent Near-Surface Ozone Depletion at Northern High Latitudes in Spring
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[1] Springtime near-surface ozone depletion has been observed at northern high latitudes. Due to limited observations, the spatial and temporal extent of low O3 concentrations near the surface is still unknown. A regional 3-D chemistry and transport model is applied to simulate surface O3 depletion catalyzed by bromine radicals at northern high latitudes in March and April 2000. Satellite observations of BrO column by the ESA Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME) were processed to specify the BrO concentrations in the lower troposphere. In view of the GOME measurement and model uncertainties, the model results show an adequate agreement with the O3 depletion events observed at two surface sites, Alert, Canada (82.5°N, 62.3°W) and Barrow, Alaska (71.3°N, 156.6°W), and by airborne in situ and DIAL instrument during the TOPSE experiments at northern high latitudes. Low O3 events at Alert appear to be mostly driven by transport of O3-poor air from high BrO regions. Model results indicate that low O3 concentrations (<20 ppbv) near the surface cover ∼60% of the northern high latitudes and that the depleted O3 concentrations (<10 ppbv) cover ∼20% of the region in April. The high BrO events tend to be large-scale and persistent (1–2 weeks). We find that they are correlated with low temperature, a condition conducive for heterogeneous reactions on frozen snow or aerosol surfaces.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".