Effects of handling during experimental procedures on stress indices in the green shore crab, <i>Carcinus maenas</i> (L)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stress due to handling is often an unavoidable feature of experimental investigations. In some cases, appropriate settling times are not considered, and as such, physiological responses caused by handling may become additive with those of experimental treatments. This study investigated the effect of different handling procedures on the acute physiological responses of green shore crab (Carcinus maenas). Handling, such as would occur during transport around a research facility or transfer during experimental procedure, was designated as light (10 min emersion) or severe (10 min emersion with shaking). Oxygen consumption (MO2) and haemolymph glucose and haemolymph L-lactate concentrations were elevated post-handling, the magnitude of the change related to the severity of handling stress. Glucose and L-lactate concentrations peaked within 1 h and returned to basal levels within 6 h, but MO2 remained elevated for 10 h, reflecting the additional energy required to oxidize L-lactate and replenish energy reserves. Differences between light and severe handling treatments showed that vibration (shaking) was a major contributor to the stress response, rather than the experimental emersion. This was confirmed in a second experiment where crabs were handled without emersion, and MO2 remained elevated for 14 h. In this experiment, the most pronounced increase in MO2 and metabolic parameters occurred in crabs that were physically touched and moved rapidly from the holding to experimental tanks. Here the touch, as well as vibration and visual stimuli, provoked a fight-flight response in the crabs. Stress responses were also evident in crabs gently transferred by containers. The fact that transferring crabs with no physical touching and minimal visual and vibrational stimuli still evoked a stress response, albeit less pronounced, supports a recommendation that crustaceans should be left to settle in the apparatus for at least 12 h after handling before experimental procedures are initiated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".