MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3160847691 · doi:10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100534

Protocol for derivation of organoids and patient-derived orthotopic xenografts from glioma patient tumors

2021· article· en· W3160847691 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Anaïs Oudin, Virginie Baus, Vanessa Barthelemy, Carina Fabian, Eliane Klein, Monika Dieterle, May Wantz, Ann‐Christin Hau, Claire Dording, Amandine Bernard, Alessandro Michelucci, Yahaya A Yabo, Georgia Kanli, Olivier Keunen, Rolf Bjerkvig, Simone P. Niclou, Anna Golebiewska

Bibliographic record

VenueSTAR Protocols · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSFonds National de la Recherche LuxembourgInternational Council for Canadian StudiesEuropean CommissionFP7 Coherent Development of Research Policies
KeywordsOrganoidGliomaProtocol (science)MedicineBrain tumorOncologyCancer researchComputer sciencePathologyBiologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tumor organoids and patient-derived orthotopic xenografts (PDOXs) are some of the most valuable pre-clinical tools in cancer research. In this protocol, we describe efficient derivation of organoids and PDOX models from glioma patient tumors. We provide detailed steps for organoid culture, intracranial implantation, and detection of tumors in the brain. We further present technical adjustments for standardized functional assays and drug testing. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Golebiewska et al. (2020).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.150

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0450.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSTAR ProtocolsSame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207