The influence of roots on mycorrhizal fungi, saprotrophic microbes and carbon dynamics in a low‐phosphorus <i>Eucalyptus</i> forest under elevated CO<sub>2</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide (eCO 2 ) can impact soil organic matter (SOM) dynamics by changing the rates of carbon (C) losses and gains. In the rhizosphere, these changes are usually assumed to be the result of root‐mediated eCO 2 impacts on saprotrophic microbes via altered below‐ground C allocation. This C allocation can also impact mycorrhizal fungi and their role in SOM dynamics. However, direct field quantifications of the influence of roots on both mycorrhizal fungi and saprotrophs together with SOM dynamics in forests exposed to eCO 2 are rare. This is especially true in phosphorus (P)‐limited systems, even though ecosystem responses to eCO 2 are known to depend on P availability. We assessed root mediation of eCO 2 impacts on saprotrophs, mycorrhizal fungi, and C dynamics of root litter and mineral soil C (SOM‐C) in a mature, P‐limited Eucalyptus woodland exposed to eCO 2 . We used a novel nested‐mesh‐bag method to manipulate roots access to the substrates in a 1‐year field incubation. We used an isotopic approach to trace C dynamics and performed a comprehensive microbial community analysis, along with nutrients and enzymatic activity measurements. Roots increased microbial biomass, fungal:bacterial ratio, plant‐derived C gains and substrate C losses while decreasing P availability and specific enzymatic activity. eCO 2 increased bacterial relative abundance in root litter and protozoa in SOM‐C, but it did not enhance root impacts or mycorrhizal fungi biomass. Our combination of in‐situ approaches allowed us to demonstrate that while roots have multiple impacts on soil microbial communities and C dynamics, they are not the main drivers of responses to eCO 2 in this P‐limited forest. Other factors beyond enhanced root‐derived below‐ground C inputs such as seasonality of nutrient and water availability, and shifts in plant communities may be more important in modulating eCO 2 impacts on soil dynamics in P‐limited systems. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".