The effect of three-phase contact line pinning during the passage of an isolated bubble through a confining pore
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The change in the internal pressure of an isolated dispersed phase passing through a confined geometry can be determined by tracking its deformation. While some research has been carried out on the motion of the dispersed phase, these have mostly focused on the calculation of the critical pressure required for the phase to enter the confined geometry and did not account for the variation of pressure across the phase as it passes through a confined geometry. In the current study, an algorithm based on the shadowgraph method was developed to evaluate the instantaneous change in the pressure of an isolated bubble passing through a confined geometry. The result of the study showed that the pressure across the bubble varies at different locations along the pore. The critical pressure was determined by detecting the change in pressure introduced at the entrance of the pore geometry. The results showed that the critical pressure increases as the size of the bubble increases. Phase pinning introduced a significant pressure change across the bubble as it exits the pore, resulting in significant deceleration of the bubble. The results of different sizes of bubbles passing through the same geometry showed that the pinning of the phase intensifies as the bubble size increases. The present study confirms the significance of the interaction of the solid interface and the dispersed phase on the motion of two immiscible flows in a confined geometry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".