Supervised topic modeling for predicting molecular substructure from mass spectrometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<ns3:p>Small-molecule metabolites are principal actors in myriad phenomena across biochemistry and serve as an important source of biomarkers and drug candidates. Given a sample of unknown composition, identifying the metabolites present is difficult given the large number of small molecules both known and yet to be discovered. Even for biofluids such as human blood, building reliable ways of identifying biomarkers is challenging. A workhorse method for characterizing individual molecules in such untargeted metabolomics studies is tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). MS/MS spectra provide rich information about chemical composition. However, structural characterization from spectra corresponding to unknown molecules remains a bottleneck in metabolomics. Current methods often rely on matching to pre-existing databases in one form or another. Here we develop a preprocessing scheme and supervised topic modeling approach to identify modular groups of spectrum fragments and neutral losses corresponding to chemical substructures using labeled latent Dirichlet allocation (LLDA) to map spectrum features to known chemical structures. These structures appear in new unknown spectra and can be predicted. We find that LLDA is an interpretable and reliable method for structure prediction from MS/MS spectra. Specifically, the LLDA approach has the following advantages: (a) molecular topics are interpretable; (b) A practitioner can select any set of chemical structure labels relevant to their problem; (c ) LLDA performs well and can exceed the performance of other methods in predicting substructures in novel contexts.</ns3:p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".