The Sulfolene Protecting Group: Observation of a Direct Photoinitiated Cheletropic Ring Opening
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Photolabile protecting groups offer synthetic routes with facile deprotection by photolysis, providing higher yields with less workup. Protecting groups producing only gaseous byproducts upon removal are particularly desirable as sustainable reagents. Cheletropic reactions provide just this combination of photocleavable groups with gaseous byproducts. However, only few protecting groups for cheletropic reactions have been described and little is known about their photochemistry and associated stereochemistry. Here we show that the sulfolene protecting group, used for diene protection and functionalization, can be photochemically removed. First, using TD‐DFT, we conclude that the photochemical ring‐opening occurs conrotatorily in a concerted process, consistent with the Woodward‐Hoffmann rules. Experimentally, we demonstrate that this process can be photoinitiated by radiation between 180 and 300 nm and confirm the proposed stereochemistry in solution. Using time‐resolved photoelectron spectroscopy, we determine that the first steps in the photochemical ring‐opening of sulfolene occur on ultrafast timescales (≤84 fs), consistent with a fully concerted process. Our findings expand applications of the sulfolene protecting group and promise an easy strategy for control of cis‐trans isomerization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".