The Effect of CO2 on Resting-State Functional Connectivity: Isocapnia vs. Poikilocapnia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The normal variability in breath size and frequency results in breath-to-breath variability of end-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2), the measured variable, and arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), the independent variable affecting cerebral blood flow (CBF). This study examines the effect of variability in PaCO2 on the pattern of resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) connectivity. A region of interest (ROI)-to-ROI and Seed-to-Voxel first-level bivariate correlation, hemodynamic response function (hrf)-weighted analysis for measuring rs-fMRI connectivity was performed during two resting-state conditions: (a) normal breathing associated with breath-to-breath variation in PaCO2 (poikilocapnia), and (b) normal breathing with breath-to-breath variability of PETCO2 dampened using sequential rebreathing (isocapnia). End-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2) was used as a measurable surrogate for fluctuations of PaCO2. During poikilocapnia, enhanced functional connections were found between the cerebellum and inferior frontal and supramarginal gyrus (SG), visual cortex and occipital fusiform gyrus; and between the primary visual network (PVN) and the hippocampal formation. During isocapnia, these associations were not seen, rather enhanced functional connections were identified in the corticostriatal pathway between the putamen and intracalacarine cortex, supracalcarine cortex (SCC), and precuneus cortex. We conclude that vascular responses to variations in PETCO2, account for at least some of the observed resting state synchronization of blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".