MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3161212920 · doi:10.1002/vrc2.98

Sub‐epiglottic pharyngeal pouch remnant cyst in a 6‐month‐old female Labrador Retriever

2021· article· en· W3161212920 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Giuseppe Bonanno, Catriona Laird, Alistair Cox, R. N. White

Bibliographic record

VenueVeterinary Record Case Reports · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Anomalies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLabrador RetrieverCystPouchTongueAnatomySurgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A 6‐month‐old entire female Labrador Retriever was presented for intermittent respiratory rasping and rattling made worse with excitement and exercise, which appeared to be distressing for the patient. Clinical findings revealed a fluid‐filled cystic structure at the base of the tongue in a sub‐epiglottic position. Serum concentrations of total thyroxine, free thyroxine and thyroid‐stimulating hormone were within normal limits. A CT scan revealed a 2‐cm diameter spherical, encapsulated structure, filled with fluid attenuating material, positioned in the midline at the base of the tongue adjacent to the basihyoid. The cyst was surgically excised via an oral approach, and histopathological findings were suggestive of a pharyngeal pouch remnant cyst. There were no post‐surgical complications, and the dog made an unremarkable recovery. At 12‐month long‐term follow‐up, the owner reported that the dog remained fit and well showing no further signs of respiratory noise, exercise restriction or evidence of recurrence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVeterinary Record Case ReportsSame topicHead and Neck AnomaliesFrench-language works237,207