MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3161241016 · doi:10.1101/2021.01.20.427494

GABA facilitates spike propagation through branch points of sensory axons in the spinal cord

2021· preprint· en· W3161241016 on OpenAlexafffund
Krishnapriya Hari, Ana M. Lucas‐Osma, Krista Metz, Shihao Lin, Noah Pardell, David A. Roszko, Sophie Black, Anna Minarik, Rahul Singla, Marilee J. Stephens, Robert A. Pearce, Karim Fouad, Kelvin E. Jones, Monica A. Gorassini, Keith K. Fenrich, Yaqing Li, David J. Bennett

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research
Canadian institutionsWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignNational Institutes of HealthCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMcLean Hospital
KeywordsNeuroscienceGABAergicAxonSensory systemOptogeneticsInhibitory postsynaptic potentialSpinal cordBiologyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Movement and posture depend on sensory feedback that is regulated by specialized GABAergic neurons (GAD2 + ) that form axo-axonic contacts onto myelinated proprioceptive sensory axons and are thought to be inhibitory. However, we report here that activating GAD2 + neurons, directly with optogenetics or indirectly by cutaneous stimulation, facilitates sensory feedback to motoneurons in awake rodents and humans. GABA A receptors and GAD2 + innervation at or near nodes of Ranvier of sensory axons cause this facilitation, preventing spike propagation failure at the many axon branch points, which is otherwise common without GABA. In contrast, GABA A receptors are generally lacking from axon terminals (unlike GABA B ) and do not presynaptically inhibit transmitter release onto motoneurons. GABAergic innervation near nodes and branch points allows individual branches to function autonomously, with GAD2 + neurons regulating which branches conduct, adding a computational layer to the neuronal networks generating movement and likely generalizing to other CNS axons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchFrench-language works237,207