MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3161270521 · doi:10.1101/2021.05.17.444454

Decoding Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Allosteric Communication to Gq and β-arrestin

2021· preprint· en· W3161270521 on OpenAlexaff
Anita K. Nivedha, Yubo Cao, Sangbae Lee, S. Bhattacharya, Stéphane A. Laporte, Nagarajan Vaidehi

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAllosteric regulationG protein-coupled receptorArrestinChemistryBinding siteReceptorG proteinBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The allosteric communication between the agonist binding site and the G protein or β-arrestin coupling sites in G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play an important role in determining ligand efficacy towards these two signaling pathways and hence the ligand bias. Knowledge of the amino acid residue networks involved in the allosteric communication will aid understanding GPCR signaling and the design of biased ligands. Angiotensin II type I receptor (AT1R) is an ideal model GPCR to study the molecular basis of ligand bias as it has multiple β-arrestin2 and Gq protein biased agonists as well as three-dimensional structures. Using Molecular Dynamics simulations, dynamic allostery analysis, and functional BRET assays, we identified a network of residues involved in allosteric communication from the angiotensin II binding site to the putative Gq coupling sites and another network to the β-arrestin2 coupling sites, with 6 residues common to both pathways located in TM3, TM5 and TM6. Our findings unveil unique and common allosteric communication residue hubs for Gq and β-arr2 coupling by AngII ligands and suggests that some of these residues can be targeted to design biased AT1R ligands. Finally, we show through analysis of the inter-residue distance distributions of the activation microswitches involved in class A GPCR activation for ten different agonists, that these microswitches behave like rheostats with different relative strengths of activation, which we speculate could modulate the relative efficacy of these agonists toward the two signaling pathways. Significance Statement Knowledge of the residues involved in allosteric communication from the ligand binding site to the G protein or β-arrestin (β-arr) coupling sites in GPCRs will aid in understanding their role in mediating ligand bias. Using a combination of molecular dynamics simulations and functional signaling assays we have identified a network of residues involved in allosteric communication from the Angiotensin II (Ang II) binding site to the Gq and β-arr2 coupling sites in the Ang II type I receptor (AT1R). The residues in the allosteric network for β-arr2 coupling are distributed across multiple structural regions of AT1R compared to Gq coupling. The residues in the two networks show conserved chemical properties across class A GPCRs, demonstrating the importance of allosteric communication in modulating ligand bias.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling→French-language works237,207→