Psychiatric hospital experiences that support and frustrate emerging adults' psychological needs: A <scp>self‐determination</scp> theory perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: There are international efforts to implement developmentally appropriate and youth-oriented mental health services for emerging adults to increase treatment engagement and the success of early intervention. While significant progress has been made in developing community service models, limited research has focused on how to design psychiatric inpatient settings that promote the recovery of emerging adults. The present study attempts to address this knowledge gap through a qualitative exploration of hospital experiences that influence psychological need satisfaction and frustration, as defined by self-determination theory (SDT). METHODS: Inpatients (N = 104) from an emerging adult psychiatry unit were interviewed regarding hospital experiences that related to satisfaction or frustration of SDT needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. RESULTS: A basic interpretative qualitative analysis highlighted six key aspects of the hospital experience relevant to these needs: (a) social interactions, (b) freedom of behaviour and access, (c) programs and activities, (d) treatment collaboration and choice, (e) restraining/unpleasant hospital practices, and (f) progress, symptoms, and functioning. The findings support SDT's emphasis on the importance of autonomy support, structure, and involvement for need satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The study sheds light on aspects of the hospital milieu that may be essential to recovery-oriented inpatient care and on experiences that may be distinctly important for emerging adults, such as support for independence and the opportunity to relate to same-age co-patients experiencing similar mental health problems and life circumstances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".