Are Methylaluminoxane Activators Sheets?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Density functional theory calculations on neutral sheet models for methylaluminoxane (MAO) indicate that these structures, containing 5‐coordinate and 4‐coordinate Al, are likely precursors to ion‐pairs seen during the hydrolysis of trimethylaluminum (Me 3 Al) in the presence of donors such as octamethyltrisiloxane (OMTS). Ionization by both methide ([Me] − ) and [Me 2 Al] + abstraction, involving this donor, were studied by polarizable continuum model calculations in fluorobenzene (PhF) and o‐difluorobenzene (DFB) media. These studies suggest that low MW, 5‐coordinate sheets ionize by [Me 2 Al] + abstraction, while [Me] − abstraction from Me 3 Al‐OMTS is the likely process for higher MW 4‐coordinate sheets. Further, comparison of anion stabilities per mole of aluminoxane repeat unit (MeAlO) n , suggest that anions such as [(MeAlO) 7 (Me 3 Al) 4 Me] − =[ 7,4 ] − are especially stable compared to higher homologues, even though their neutral precursors are unstable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".